Fading Waypoints

August 9, 2006

Survey results are up!

Filed under: General, IA Summit, Workshop, Tagging — draggin @ 5:24 am

Well that took forever. This turned out to be a very small sample, and of a highly informed and biased group. Furthermore, because of some new policies at SFU, the survey tool SurveyMonkey no longer complies with the universities regulations regarding the Patriot Act, and these results can NOT be included in our final thesis. Darn! Nevertheless, it was good practice for myself in survey design, and analysis, as well as building up a small network of future particpants within the information architechture community. Hopefully this may be helpful for future survey designers out there. OR it could jsut sckew those results all to heck as well.

It seems there were other attempts at user analysis performed at the IA summit this year. Check out Gene Smiths photos of peoples elaborate name tags. great stuff!

And now with out further ado, the much anticipated results of our tagging study. As gene explains, sort of a cultural probe. (ouch… did that hurt?)

The survey has garnered 23 respondents over all, most of them likely as a result of the email invitation that was sent out. As expected, our target demographic was in their mid thirties, using most of the common forms of digital communication available today,(predominantly email (100%), mobile phones (92%), and instant messengers (88%) 90% of the respondents considered themselves able to type, and 57% preferred the apple operating system.

Although only one respondent had not used the tagging functionality of any website, most of them did not find tagclouds very useful or informative, as shown by some quotes such as “not really, it gives me a high level view of the main things I seem to be paying attention to, but mostly it is a pretty picture” and “no, it’s awful. fairly useless except that they show you the top 3-4 tags.” 5 respondents did indicate that the tagcloud was useful to some degree such as “yes, i like seeing which tags i use the most. but i am a librarian.” I did not expect the tagclouds to be that significant part of the tagging experience, and the responses support that. As tags are used in various ways, the tagcloud is only meant to serve as a zeitgeist or gestalt view of the collection of tags. It does not represent the collection so much as the taggers interventions in organizing the collection. Other positive comments regarding tagclouds were, “fun”, “pretty”, “neat”, “handy”, and “cool”. The remaining results will be more useful to me as ethnographic artifacts in my continued exploration of this topic.



How old are you?
Average age: mid thirties
Total Respondents: 24
(skipped this question):0


What country is the passport you carry from?
Predominantly: Canada, USA
Total Respondents: 24
(skipped this question): 0


Check any you have used in the past week.
Mobile Phone: 22
PDA: 5
MP3 player: 12
Email: 24
Instant Messages (Chat): 21
RSS Agreggator (Bloglines): 18
Newspaper: 18
Video Game: 8

Total Respondents:24
(skipped this question):0



Do you type?
yes: 22
no: 2

Total Respondents:24
(skipped this question):0



What computer Operating System so you prefer?
Mac:12
Windows:8
Linux:1
Other:0



Do you use a grocery list?
yes:7
no:6
sometimes:10

Total Respondents:23
(skipped this question):1



Do you collect anything?
yes:14
no:7
not sure:2

Total Respondents:23
(skipped this question):1



When searching online do you use the advanced search features?
yes:11
no:2
sometimes:10

Total Respondents:23
(skipped this question):1



Do you use the tagging functionality of any websites?
yes:19
no:1
sometimes:3
what are you talking about?:0

Total Respondents:23
(skipped this question):1



Do you use the color labelling features provided by Mac OS?
yes:3
no:4
I used to:4
I plan to:1

Total Respondents:12
(skipped this question):12



How many words per minute (best guess is fine)
Average: around 60
Total Respondents:21
(skipped this question):3


How many fingers?
This question confused people
Total Respondents:21
(skipped this question):3


For what resources do you find tagging most useful?
Web URL’s (links):20
Photos:19
Music:3
Email:5
Other (please specify):5

Total Respondents:22
(skipped this question):2



Do you ever revise/update tags that you previously entered?
yes:7
no:5
sometimes:10
why would I?:0

Total Respondents:22
(skipped this question):2



*Describe your tagging ’strategy’ (one word if possible)
Open-Ended Response, remember,performative yet utilitarian, quick and dirty, minimal, personal, broad, easy, uncertain, archival, Pith, improvisational, look for and use tags - currently I am a tagee, not a tagger, semi-consistent, small sets, Eclectic, Flickr-style, quick & dirty. wait. that was 3 words. crap! stop typing!, remembery, carefree, clean, personal, recognizable, clear, findable,

Total Respondents:21
(skipped this question):3



For what purpose do you find tagging most useful?
Open-Ended Response

Organizing my material for myself and others.
re-finding as well as publishing
remembering what my photos were taken of
Finding things again for myself when using many different computers in many places.
for re-finding information at a later time, or for organizing artifacts in many different (simultaneous) groupings
refindability
finding my own stuff, sharing my collections of stuff with others, finding out what other people have in their similar collections
Another method of finding archival material.
I like to define content in my own terms, and to understand how other users conceptualize of content. I suppose in that respect it is helpful in searching someone else’s content - such as photos on Flickr.
marking people, places and things that recurr. For example, I might go camping with Mike. Then I go to the beach with Mike. I’m not going to group those photos as Mike — but with tagging, I can find them later.
identifying themes
Making personal collections so I can find things more easily again; creating my own organizational schemes; generating RSS so I can use content elsewhere, different ways of exploring the wide world’s collection of tagged content;

Later search
quickly categorizing stuff so I can find it later

Locating stuff later
In del.icio.us the tagging features lets me discover cool stuff saved by others

watching other people’s streams of consciousness. finding things that are interesting by watching interesting people.
organizing, connecting with like resources
To organize huge amounts of information in a way that’s meaningful to me.

Total Respondents:19
(skipped this question):5



Does the tagcloud assist you in understanding the organization of a system? If so please describe.
Open-Ended Response

Tagclouds are more like neat tricks than useful tools. It’s fun to see that common tags are bigger/bolder but that rarely provides significant information for me.
no
no, hate ‘em
yes, i like seeing which tags i use the most. but i am a librarian.
When using a system socially a tagcloud helps me to understand the bias of the system’s society.
only slightly
Yes, but probably not as much as I think.
No. Looks cool, but a frequency listing is more useful.
To some degree.
Not so much.
yes - my learning style is very visual so a quick tagcloud view tells me lots
Sometimes, I do not always give them a lot of attention (the cloud heights are very much relative.
No, it’s awful information design, and next to useless.
If it exists, it can help give a quick picture of the topics at hand. Not useful in much depth.
yes. seeing more ‘common’ tags is handy.

Not really. It just lets me see what all the other monkeys find interesting.
don’t use it

no, it’s awful. fairly useless except that they show you the top 3-4 tags.
not really, it gives me a high level view of the main things I seem to be paying attention to, but mostly it is a pretty picture

Total Respondents:19
(skipped this question):5



Would you be interested in being contacted for future involvement in our study?
yes:15
no thanks!:6

Total Respondents:21
(skipped this question):3



Comments? Questons? Feedback of any kind whatsoever?

Total Respondents:11
(skipped this question):13

Technorati Tags:

March 27, 2006

Taggin Survey

Filed under: General, IA Summit, Tagging, Draggin — draggin @ 11:35 pm

update 04/11/06: there seemed to be a problem with the survey closing too soon, it is now open till the end of april. thanks.

Our presentation was last monday, and all went fairly according to plan. Anthony and myself were pleased with the turnout and response, even though the room was ENORMOUS, as my pictures on flickr will attest to. I was glad we did the last minute hack and slash of the talk as we timed just right for people to get out of there for lunch.

The take away of our presentation was an invitation to our audience to participate in some initial data gathering in the form of a survey. Since our audience now extends onto the web, if you are at all interested in tagging, you too are welcome to complete the following survey, wether you were at the IAsummit or not.

It is a short survey, (approximately 5 min) and there are no mandatory questions, fill in the info you would like to. We will be keeping the survey open for the next couple weeks or so, until at least I can email all the new people I met. When completed the results will be posted here as well. Thanks in advance for your participation!

>>>This way to Our Survey

Technorati Tags:

March 25, 2006

1 more sleep till iasummit

Filed under: IA Summit, Tags as Interface, Draggin — draggin @ 9:19 am

The IA summit starts tomorrow… this feels like the xmas eve when i was 8 or something. Too bad I was not able to attend any of the pre confernce workshops, but I’ll will be scouring the blogs looking for details on how that went.

Earlier this week, Phillip Jeffery hosted Scott Golder out at UBC and I was fortunate to be able to attend.  Its always cool to meet a few more people going in to a conference and get some of the discussions going early. Scotts presentation was great, and as he has done some of the only quantitative research on the use of del.icio.us, vitaly important. Somebody may have to pick up where he left off because as Phillip mentioned one of the questions that arose from the discussion was “why dont people “retag“? and as the scope of Scott’s study was only for a 72 hr. time span, it did not really provide any information that would shed some light on that. This question is central to the presentation we will be giving on monday, and in a nutshell i can say they don’t do it, cause they are no decent affordances for them to do so.  Of course it could also have to do with the other question that arose, “What type of person is drawn to tagging?” Anthony and I will be tackling the first question however, and not to let anything out of the bag early,  for us, its all about the tagcloud.

Scott Leslie, edublogger supreme, mentioned last week that Tagclouds should be be more group sepcific, an observation with which I couldn’t agree more.

One of the things that has always bugged me about broad tagclouds like the one on del.icio.us or flickr
is that, well, they are really broad - there is nothing connecting all
of the words appearing in the tagcloud other than that they were used
by any user of one of these services, and the userbases on
these services are totally heterogenous. So sure, I can see generally
what the popular tags for all flickr or del.icio.us users are, but why
should I care? What I do care about is what the tags used in my particular community are.

That said, he points to Gnosh a new service for clustering your own little bits of the weeb together, which seems to use as a primary interface device… a tagcloud.  nice. We’ll see how this beta service pans out, but I hope its more responsive than the orginal Tagcloud, which either has been brought to its knees by sheer demand, or is on hold pending subsumption by some, much larger fish. And I was sooo hoping to have the fading waypoints tagcloud active for our presentation on monday. Hmmph.

Not to be out done, Brian the headmaster of disaster, blogged about the code smithery of one of the geniuses he works with, who came up with a nifty gadget that embeds his own del.icio.us tagcloud right on his blog! This allows users to navigate Brians link collection without ever having to leave his site! Sweetness!  …uuuhh is there a sign up form or anything?, because I just have to get me some of that. Excellent work Enej!

The point of this post, and hopefully that we will be able to make clear as mud on monday is that the tagcloud is here to stay, and will be joining the ranks of traditional menu navigation and free text search as a standard means for users to interact with information on a site.

Technorati Tags:

February 21, 2006

Delicious API - Deux

Filed under: General, IA Summit, Tagging, Tags as Interface — Anton @ 12:43 pm

Took another stab at the cloud of related tags with some additional CSS  used to modify the position of the tags.
Now the releated tags form a circle around the main tag.

Not all that interesting yet, but im treating these as preliminary sketches and proofs of concept.

Technorati Tags:

February 20, 2006

Delicious API

Filed under: General, IA Summit, Tagging — Anton @ 1:06 am

I spent most of yesterday setting up my own delicious api reader in PHP, and it’s working pretty well thanks to the nice XML structure supplied by the delicious crew. It was much easier than I originally anticiapted, at least the initial phase was.  Currently I am just reading from the results returned from the del.icio.us/api/posts/all? request, then moving the data into my own structure, which currently looks like this:
tags= [tagName[count:Num, neighbours:[tagName:count]]]
The current version provides the exact same information that delicious does - a tag cloud and related tags, without any information on the resource. That of course will come next.
The big deal here (at least for me) is that I own the data and I can manipulate it. Its not pretty, functional, or finished  but it’s mine.

Based on the way the API works you will need to send your delicious username and password before you can see the list.
I do not store, file, or even peek at your username/passwords. I send them to delicious and then eat the piece of paper they were written on.

Technorati Tags:

February 11, 2006

One-Dimensional CA

Filed under: IA Summit, Rules — Anton @ 3:05 am

I’m going to start posting the rules of a several cellular automata systems as I understand them. I’ll break each type of CA into three sections; The Cell, The Petri Dish and The Rules. The Cell will cover the organisms basic states, the Petri Dish will outline the world that the cell inhabits, and The Rules will be just that how the cell interactes with other cells in the Petri Dish.

First up, One-Dimensional CA.

The Cell

The Cell in one-dimensional CA is a binary organism, having only two states:on and off/alive and dead.
These states can be represented though ones and zeros or visually through dark and light dots.
the two states of a binary cell

The Petri Dish

One-dimesional CA live in a linear grid that extends from left to right. A cell can have a maximum of two nieghbours, the cell directly to the left and the cell directly to the right.

The Rules

  • Like all forms of CA, time(t) is the key factor of change in one-dimesional CA.
  • The next interval of time(t+1) is represented by a new linear grid under the the current interval.
  • The state of a Cell(c) in the next interval is determined by the state the cell directly to the left(c-1) and the cell directly to the right(c+1).
  • If a Cell is off, it remains off only if both of it’s neighbours are off. Otherwise it turns on.
  • If a Cell is on, it remains on unless both of it’s nieghbours are also on, in which case it turns off.
Possible States of a Cell in One-Dimesional CA
c-1 (t) c (t) c+1 (t) c (t+1)
0 0 0 0
0 0 1 1
0 1 0 1
0 1 1 1
1 0 0 1
1 0 1 1
1 1 0 1
1 1 1 0

Here’s a visual representation of the same rules. The top row represents t, and the bottom row represents t+1

Possible States of a Cell in One-Dimesional CA

Here’s a basic Flash animation that shows the life cycle of one-dimesional CA.

Technorati Tags:

February 4, 2006

It’s in

Filed under: IA Summit, Draggin — draggin @ 3:08 am

Working right up to the crunch, Anthony and I submitted the final version of our paper to the conference proceedings. It is also now posted on this website for anyone wanting a preview. We chose to pull back a bit on the scope as we were not sure where the planned workshops are going to take us. I am happy we covered what we did though. It gives some direction to our study without committing too much.

As this was coming together, it was amazing to realize just how fast the topic of tagging is moving. No sooner had the paper been submitted, and this post from robin good comes across my rss reader. Titled Folksonomies: Tags Strengths, Weaknesses And How To Make Them Work, Robin goes down a similar path, reviewing whats working, whats not and bringing forward some clever ideas to improve outcomes for users. This is an excellent companion to our work filling in many pieces we missed. A valuable asset for us.

One of the many good ideas that stand out…

Tagging could be improved by providing users with a set of helpful heuristics that promote good tag selection, such as a checklist of questions that could be applied to the object being tagged, in order to direct the tagger to various salient characteristics.

I still have to absorb the full impact of this post, but it is good to know that there is a need out there for further research on this stuff, and I hope we can offer some useful contributions to that end.

Technorati Tags:

January 17, 2006

Steve

Filed under: IA Summit, Workshop, Tagging, Usablility — Anton @ 7:24 am

I am currently doing the Google rounds on existing (mob) tagging workshops in order to prepare for our workshop/paper and I came across steve - Social Terminology Enhancement through Vernacular Engagement.[link]

Steve is a project being developed by a group of museums that want the public to engage with their collections by allowing them to search for an item though a social filter. The way museum curator catalogues a collection is rarely the same as member of the public would search for it.

Curators rarely answer the question “What is this a picture of?”[link]

For example:

A curator may catalogue this image as Italy,futurism, painting, 1912, Balla. Giacomo
Whereas a person searching for it my use terms like dog, daschund, motion, blur

Steve is an attempt to democratize a collections catalogue, not by replacing the curators perspective, but by adding an additional layer of information provided by the public.

Bonus - Steve appears to be under a creative commons/share and share alike licence.

Technorati Tags:

January 12, 2006

Dealing with detractors

Filed under: IA Summit — Anton @ 7:20 am

We should also think about addressing some of the comments from our peer review, as well as some well known issues with tagging and folksonomy in general.
Some points that I think we need to follow up on:
Natural Language Part-of-Speech Tagging. Hidden Markov Model
Synonym & Homonym problems.
Hidden Long Tail - Chris Anderson
Tags can be temporal - and subject to change: toRead, toSee, toBuy, toVistit; read, seen,  bought, been

A quick brain dump that I intend to revist, edit and breakout from as I see fit.

Technorati Tags:

Workshop ideas

Filed under: IA Summit — Anton @ 6:54 am

One of the first things I think we need to do is generate some data on tagging. In my opinion, the best way to do this is to get a bunch of people to tag a bunch of stuff a mobtagging party or something. Invite your friends - it will be cool. You do want to be cool, don’t you.

The purpose of the flashburningmobtagsonomic workshop is to get a sense of how people tag things, how the act of tagging effect the taggers relation to the data, and the data’s relation to other data - how the data organizes itself).

I would like to implement a couple of iterations on this process.

  1. Free Form Tagging.
  2. Weighted tagging - manual weighting - like setting a rating in itunes.
  3. Weighted tagging - position sets the weight - first tag is more important than the second etc…. if two or more tags share the same weight, then place them in square brackets [ ]

Questions:

  • What exactly should we have people tag? Books? Movies? Music? Recipes?
    My feeling is we should stick to things that are easy enough to categorize on their own and something people may feel passionate about.
  • How many things do we need in our data pool?
  • How many people should we get for the workshop?
Technorati Tags:
Next Page »

Powered by WordPress