Fading Waypoints

August 9, 2006

Final project

Filed under: General — draggin @ 5:43 am

What to do with two shoeboxes of tapes?For my final research project I am exploring the nature of collecting and archiving media, specifically cassette tapes. As their time has passed, I feel it timely to look back, gather up those dusty shoe boxes one last time, and see if there are any informational design goodies that can be had.

Please see the project website for further information. http://mycassettes.blogspot.com/

Or the project image pool to participate. http://www.flickr.com/groups/mycassettes/

This is my other blog.

Technorati Tags:

Survey results are up!

Filed under: General, IA Summit, Workshop, Tagging — draggin @ 5:24 am

Well that took forever. This turned out to be a very small sample, and of a highly informed and biased group. Furthermore, because of some new policies at SFU, the survey tool SurveyMonkey no longer complies with the universities regulations regarding the Patriot Act, and these results can NOT be included in our final thesis. Darn! Nevertheless, it was good practice for myself in survey design, and analysis, as well as building up a small network of future particpants within the information architechture community. Hopefully this may be helpful for future survey designers out there. OR it could jsut sckew those results all to heck as well.

It seems there were other attempts at user analysis performed at the IA summit this year. Check out Gene Smiths photos of peoples elaborate name tags. great stuff!

And now with out further ado, the much anticipated results of our tagging study. As gene explains, sort of a cultural probe. (ouch… did that hurt?)

The survey has garnered 23 respondents over all, most of them likely as a result of the email invitation that was sent out. As expected, our target demographic was in their mid thirties, using most of the common forms of digital communication available today,(predominantly email (100%), mobile phones (92%), and instant messengers (88%) 90% of the respondents considered themselves able to type, and 57% preferred the apple operating system.

Although only one respondent had not used the tagging functionality of any website, most of them did not find tagclouds very useful or informative, as shown by some quotes such as “not really, it gives me a high level view of the main things I seem to be paying attention to, but mostly it is a pretty picture” and “no, it’s awful. fairly useless except that they show you the top 3-4 tags.” 5 respondents did indicate that the tagcloud was useful to some degree such as “yes, i like seeing which tags i use the most. but i am a librarian.” I did not expect the tagclouds to be that significant part of the tagging experience, and the responses support that. As tags are used in various ways, the tagcloud is only meant to serve as a zeitgeist or gestalt view of the collection of tags. It does not represent the collection so much as the taggers interventions in organizing the collection. Other positive comments regarding tagclouds were, “fun”, “pretty”, “neat”, “handy”, and “cool”. The remaining results will be more useful to me as ethnographic artifacts in my continued exploration of this topic.



How old are you?
Average age: mid thirties
Total Respondents: 24
(skipped this question):0


What country is the passport you carry from?
Predominantly: Canada, USA
Total Respondents: 24
(skipped this question): 0


Check any you have used in the past week.
Mobile Phone: 22
PDA: 5
MP3 player: 12
Email: 24
Instant Messages (Chat): 21
RSS Agreggator (Bloglines): 18
Newspaper: 18
Video Game: 8

Total Respondents:24
(skipped this question):0



Do you type?
yes: 22
no: 2

Total Respondents:24
(skipped this question):0



What computer Operating System so you prefer?
Mac:12
Windows:8
Linux:1
Other:0



Do you use a grocery list?
yes:7
no:6
sometimes:10

Total Respondents:23
(skipped this question):1



Do you collect anything?
yes:14
no:7
not sure:2

Total Respondents:23
(skipped this question):1



When searching online do you use the advanced search features?
yes:11
no:2
sometimes:10

Total Respondents:23
(skipped this question):1



Do you use the tagging functionality of any websites?
yes:19
no:1
sometimes:3
what are you talking about?:0

Total Respondents:23
(skipped this question):1



Do you use the color labelling features provided by Mac OS?
yes:3
no:4
I used to:4
I plan to:1

Total Respondents:12
(skipped this question):12



How many words per minute (best guess is fine)
Average: around 60
Total Respondents:21
(skipped this question):3


How many fingers?
This question confused people
Total Respondents:21
(skipped this question):3


For what resources do you find tagging most useful?
Web URL’s (links):20
Photos:19
Music:3
Email:5
Other (please specify):5

Total Respondents:22
(skipped this question):2



Do you ever revise/update tags that you previously entered?
yes:7
no:5
sometimes:10
why would I?:0

Total Respondents:22
(skipped this question):2



*Describe your tagging ’strategy’ (one word if possible)
Open-Ended Response, remember,performative yet utilitarian, quick and dirty, minimal, personal, broad, easy, uncertain, archival, Pith, improvisational, look for and use tags - currently I am a tagee, not a tagger, semi-consistent, small sets, Eclectic, Flickr-style, quick & dirty. wait. that was 3 words. crap! stop typing!, remembery, carefree, clean, personal, recognizable, clear, findable,

Total Respondents:21
(skipped this question):3



For what purpose do you find tagging most useful?
Open-Ended Response

Organizing my material for myself and others.
re-finding as well as publishing
remembering what my photos were taken of
Finding things again for myself when using many different computers in many places.
for re-finding information at a later time, or for organizing artifacts in many different (simultaneous) groupings
refindability
finding my own stuff, sharing my collections of stuff with others, finding out what other people have in their similar collections
Another method of finding archival material.
I like to define content in my own terms, and to understand how other users conceptualize of content. I suppose in that respect it is helpful in searching someone else’s content - such as photos on Flickr.
marking people, places and things that recurr. For example, I might go camping with Mike. Then I go to the beach with Mike. I’m not going to group those photos as Mike — but with tagging, I can find them later.
identifying themes
Making personal collections so I can find things more easily again; creating my own organizational schemes; generating RSS so I can use content elsewhere, different ways of exploring the wide world’s collection of tagged content;

Later search
quickly categorizing stuff so I can find it later

Locating stuff later
In del.icio.us the tagging features lets me discover cool stuff saved by others

watching other people’s streams of consciousness. finding things that are interesting by watching interesting people.
organizing, connecting with like resources
To organize huge amounts of information in a way that’s meaningful to me.

Total Respondents:19
(skipped this question):5



Does the tagcloud assist you in understanding the organization of a system? If so please describe.
Open-Ended Response

Tagclouds are more like neat tricks than useful tools. It’s fun to see that common tags are bigger/bolder but that rarely provides significant information for me.
no
no, hate ‘em
yes, i like seeing which tags i use the most. but i am a librarian.
When using a system socially a tagcloud helps me to understand the bias of the system’s society.
only slightly
Yes, but probably not as much as I think.
No. Looks cool, but a frequency listing is more useful.
To some degree.
Not so much.
yes - my learning style is very visual so a quick tagcloud view tells me lots
Sometimes, I do not always give them a lot of attention (the cloud heights are very much relative.
No, it’s awful information design, and next to useless.
If it exists, it can help give a quick picture of the topics at hand. Not useful in much depth.
yes. seeing more ‘common’ tags is handy.

Not really. It just lets me see what all the other monkeys find interesting.
don’t use it

no, it’s awful. fairly useless except that they show you the top 3-4 tags.
not really, it gives me a high level view of the main things I seem to be paying attention to, but mostly it is a pretty picture

Total Respondents:19
(skipped this question):5



Would you be interested in being contacted for future involvement in our study?
yes:15
no thanks!:6

Total Respondents:21
(skipped this question):3



Comments? Questons? Feedback of any kind whatsoever?

Total Respondents:11
(skipped this question):13

Technorati Tags:

March 27, 2006

Taggin Survey

Filed under: General, IA Summit, Tagging, Draggin — draggin @ 11:35 pm

update 04/11/06: there seemed to be a problem with the survey closing too soon, it is now open till the end of april. thanks.

Our presentation was last monday, and all went fairly according to plan. Anthony and myself were pleased with the turnout and response, even though the room was ENORMOUS, as my pictures on flickr will attest to. I was glad we did the last minute hack and slash of the talk as we timed just right for people to get out of there for lunch.

The take away of our presentation was an invitation to our audience to participate in some initial data gathering in the form of a survey. Since our audience now extends onto the web, if you are at all interested in tagging, you too are welcome to complete the following survey, wether you were at the IAsummit or not.

It is a short survey, (approximately 5 min) and there are no mandatory questions, fill in the info you would like to. We will be keeping the survey open for the next couple weeks or so, until at least I can email all the new people I met. When completed the results will be posted here as well. Thanks in advance for your participation!

>>>This way to Our Survey

Technorati Tags:

March 25, 2006

1 more sleep till iasummit

Filed under: IA Summit, Tags as Interface, Draggin — draggin @ 9:19 am

The IA summit starts tomorrow… this feels like the xmas eve when i was 8 or something. Too bad I was not able to attend any of the pre confernce workshops, but I’ll will be scouring the blogs looking for details on how that went.

Earlier this week, Phillip Jeffery hosted Scott Golder out at UBC and I was fortunate to be able to attend.  Its always cool to meet a few more people going in to a conference and get some of the discussions going early. Scotts presentation was great, and as he has done some of the only quantitative research on the use of del.icio.us, vitaly important. Somebody may have to pick up where he left off because as Phillip mentioned one of the questions that arose from the discussion was “why dont people “retag“? and as the scope of Scott’s study was only for a 72 hr. time span, it did not really provide any information that would shed some light on that. This question is central to the presentation we will be giving on monday, and in a nutshell i can say they don’t do it, cause they are no decent affordances for them to do so.  Of course it could also have to do with the other question that arose, “What type of person is drawn to tagging?” Anthony and I will be tackling the first question however, and not to let anything out of the bag early,  for us, its all about the tagcloud.

Scott Leslie, edublogger supreme, mentioned last week that Tagclouds should be be more group sepcific, an observation with which I couldn’t agree more.

One of the things that has always bugged me about broad tagclouds like the one on del.icio.us or flickr
is that, well, they are really broad - there is nothing connecting all
of the words appearing in the tagcloud other than that they were used
by any user of one of these services, and the userbases on
these services are totally heterogenous. So sure, I can see generally
what the popular tags for all flickr or del.icio.us users are, but why
should I care? What I do care about is what the tags used in my particular community are.

That said, he points to Gnosh a new service for clustering your own little bits of the weeb together, which seems to use as a primary interface device… a tagcloud.  nice. We’ll see how this beta service pans out, but I hope its more responsive than the orginal Tagcloud, which either has been brought to its knees by sheer demand, or is on hold pending subsumption by some, much larger fish. And I was sooo hoping to have the fading waypoints tagcloud active for our presentation on monday. Hmmph.

Not to be out done, Brian the headmaster of disaster, blogged about the code smithery of one of the geniuses he works with, who came up with a nifty gadget that embeds his own del.icio.us tagcloud right on his blog! This allows users to navigate Brians link collection without ever having to leave his site! Sweetness!  …uuuhh is there a sign up form or anything?, because I just have to get me some of that. Excellent work Enej!

The point of this post, and hopefully that we will be able to make clear as mud on monday is that the tagcloud is here to stay, and will be joining the ranks of traditional menu navigation and free text search as a standard means for users to interact with information on a site.

Technorati Tags:

February 27, 2006

Tagcloud for website navigation

Filed under: Tags as Interface, Draggin — draggin @ 4:41 am

An excellent discussion emerged on rashmi’s blog about the website 83 degrees, and its use of a tagcloud for general navigation .

Overall the respondants feel its a bit too unreliable for serious usability, but has some potential to augment the more structured flow of a web site. The designer of the site reveals his reasons for implenenting it in the first place.

I am gererally not a fan of tag clouds at all because they quickly become too cluttered. In this case it was done as a design/marketing effort and not at all for UI. It turns out there are very few options for our corporate site, so it is relatively uncluttered and encourages discovery.

Found two more links from the respondants as well…

googlecloud - has apparently been released recently, quite disturbing.

and what promises to be an amazing post from joe speculating on how tag clouds may evolve. I haven’t even had time to read this yet, but if this is any indication I already looking forward to part two.

In part two, titled “Second Generation Clouds”, I’ll share some thoughts on likely ways that the second generation of tag clouds will evolve in structure and usage in the near future, based on how they support a chain of understanding that semantically links taggers and tag cloud consumers. Context is the key for tag cloud consumers, and we’ll see how it affects the likely evolution of the tag cloud as a visualization tool.

Technorati Tags:

Labels in Mac OS

Filed under: General, Usablility, Tags as Interface — Anton @ 3:15 am

Your post on colour tagging got me to thinking about labels in the Mac OS. For as long as I can remember (well at least system 7), Apple has provided the user with the ability to apply a coloured label to any file on the system.

By default, the labels are the colour names, but his can easily be changed in the finder preferences:

finder prefs

Once you set up your labels, it is a simple matter of applying it to a document through a contextual menu:

applying a label

As you can see, the colour appears directly on the view of the file in the finder:

finder view

You can also use the colour/label as a search criteria:

search

Some limitations:

  • Only Seven Labels
    This is probably due to the limitations of our short term memory.
  • No ability to change the colours
    Not a huge deal, but I like to think I can customize everything
  • Labels are Global
    You cannot have contextual labels for element in particular locations. A subset of labels for my thesis, such as papers, presentations, projects, homework etc… is not possible.
  • While I wouldn’t call labels a rich form of tagging, it does offer rudimentary tagging to your file system.

    Technorati Tags:

    Tagging UI concepts

    Filed under: Tagging, Usablility, Draggin — draggin @ 1:48 am

    These were some concepts we wanted to see in a mock up. Currently I am thinking of other ways icons could be more utilized in tagging user interfaces.

    Phillip J. got me thinking, about the idea of what he calls egotagging during our discussion at northern voice earlier this month. The idea that if you bookmark something first, you should get some kind of reward as feedback and that should be represented in the interface is an interesting one, although most likely benficial to power users only. A user could build a strong reputation as a “pro boomarker” thereby adding more value/weight to the resources she tags.
    In general, I think the del.icio.us UI could employ a tad more color and interaction, (and icons!) but I believe in the concept of slow evolution as well. These mockups show an idea for the “first tag” feedback and introduces the idea of tagging with a diamond (the equivalent of googles’ stars). I think these would also be a FAST and easy way to copy other users’ links into your own collection. (just diamond it!)

    First Tag‘ and ‘Diamond Thisinput interface


    First Tag‘ and ‘Diamond Thisfeedback interface




    This was an early thought on introducing color as a tagging element. Using color maps to visualize a tag collection has endless possibilities, but at the very least you could browse your collection by the “dark blueish” color . The feedback UI does not mean anthing too specific, just that each resource would be assigned a color label and it’s proximity to others would be further defined by its position in the color map. The draw back is that it would not allow you to specify two tags with the exact same color.

    Color Taginput interface

    Color Taginput interface

    Technorati Tags:

    February 25, 2006

    Building a Better Tagcloud

    Filed under: General, Tagging, Usablility, Tags as Interface — Anton @ 4:57 am

    Two more sketches, both attempts to combine the typical cloud and the associated tags into a single cloud element. The relationship is determined by the number of resources each tag share together, compared to the number of neighbours that tag has has over all resources.

    Sketch 1:

    The default view is a normal cloud, but as you rollover each tag, the associated tags appear around the tag in a sphere. the biggest issue with this (beyond the messy CSS) is tags with many associations start getting cramped for room, especially at the top and bottom of the sphere. I could set it up with a dynamic radius, so tags with more associations had larger radius, but that could get out of hand, and start drawing off screen, which I definitely want to avoid.

    Sketch 2:

    Same initial state as #1, but in this instance, the associated tags get a background and colour. I am also trying to suggest the strength of a the relationship between the tags by modifying the tags brightness. The brighter the colour, the more closely related the tags are. It’s pretty subtle at the moment, but it’s not too bad.

    I should point out that I have only tested these I FireFox; I’m not looking to publish these formally, and am not interested in testing and debugging in other browsers at the moment. So if these don’t work, do yourself a favour and get FireFox already.

    Technorati Tags:

    February 24, 2006

    Text collections as a tag clouds

    Filed under: Tagging, Draggin — draggin @ 3:48 am

    Recently, Anthony and I have discussed using the tagcloud for an input interface, as opposed to merely a feedback mechanism that visualizes a collection of resources. Could tag clouds become the common UI for browsing large collections of data as well as organizing and sorting them? A few links that continue this thought.

    The Power of Words - A Text Analysis of Political Discourse During Times of Crisis. via info aesthetics Uses a tag cloud to display frequency of words in poltical rhetoric, and goes the additional step of color coding specific words.

    More and more I believe, digital assets will be indexed down to finer grains of detail, and users will have the ability to apply different kinds of search methods based on their needs. This collection of Common words in Tom Waits Songs, is an interesting example of an audio collection that has scanned song lyrics and sorts the data on frequency of use. There was alot of work that went into providing this resource, something that only a true fan would do. But its easy to imagine how this data could be available and automated for any musical collection. damn interesting.

    Its seems that the trend of tagclouds are going to play an increasing role in HCI in general, not just for all these fancy dancing web 2.0 apps popping up all over the place.
    Luke states

    Search Folders, Smart Playlists, Virtual Folders, and Tags all group objects based on shared metadata and dynamically update their contents for efficient information retrieval through common attributes

    Could they become more ubiquitous than lists to display information? Not given the current state of rendering them thats for sure. There is really going to have to be an evolution for tagclouds as interfaces to become truely useful. Hopefully we can contribute to this discussion.

    Mario gives a thumbs up to vista for implenting tagging in the upcoming version of the vista OS. (and not much else). Hopefully josh can wait for it.

    So far, all I can give Microsoft credit for (from what I’ve seen) is implementing tagging for their file system. Nice move. Easy transition to non-hierarchical file systems.

    This was demonstrated at NorthernVoice earlier this month, and although they showed how all docs, media files, apps or whatever will be ‘taggable’, we did not see theUI that will be used to scan “My Computer” from a tagsonomy perspective. I wouldn’t mind having a crack at that myself.

    Technorati Tags:

    February 23, 2006

    Design elements of a tagcloud

    Filed under: Usablility, Draggin — draggin @ 11:41 am

    Design Theory

    Tag Clouds User Interface

    The elements of design are the basic building blocks or toolkit of the visual 2d artist. This is a list of the most common elements as they are understood in the field. We are thinking of tagclouds in terms of there overall relationship to the elements and principles of design. Some of the elements are used in tagcloud display while others are not. Are there opportunities to explore other graphical techniques in the display of ‘tagged data‘?
    The following are brief summaries of how a particular design element is signifigant from tag cloud Ui perspective, and a visual representation of it.
    Form (shape, line, dot, outline, contour) - Lines have many qualities in themselves such as direction, weight, and position. They are the basic elements needed to create shapes or forms, that occupy the space in a composition. Letters are a distinct type of form from an artists perspective. Quite often creative types will want to reduce the font size on a web page as much as possible treating it as a textural element. Other times it is exaggerated and distorted as the designer explores line, shape and the letterforms themselves. In tag clouds, the overall letterform, is not considered in the presentation of the data and there seems no reason that it should. If anything the font face and style would be the variables to tweak.
    Color (hue, intensity, saturation) - has tremendous expressive qualities and pyschological implications. Hue refers to the pure spectrum colors commonly referred to by the names - red, orange, yellow, blue, green violet. Color has been used in insignifigant ways to date, for example with the third party service tagcloud’s blue and orange pallette. From initial observations, the different colors are simply meant to reinforce the changes in font-size or scale. No additional information is provided by the use of color, yet in a compostion it can be one of the more evocative elements.
    Value (tone, light and dark) - is needed to create the illusion of 3d form and volume in a composition. The amount of light or dark affects color. Value can exist when color cannot and will contribute to creating the illusion of 3d space. In the case of tagclouds, Value would probably have similar applications as color. adjusting the lightness will emphasize or decrease contrast, thereby positioning the element on hieararchy of visual attention..
    Texture (pattern) - the surface quality of elements. The repitition of pattern creates texture and adds interest to a composition. The tagcloud itself becomes a pattern that has much more distinguishability than a list or paragraph. Important words stand out because of the emphasis of scale and/or color. Through overlapping and variation of Value, the texture can become more abstract. This will allow more information to be displayed, but has negative effects on legibility.
    Space (actual and virtual, positive and negative) - Taking into account the borders or frame of a composition, how the space is divided, organized, into the various parts
    Time (first, second, last…)
    - sequencing of elements. The central element in what makes animation work, from a series of images shown in sequence.
    Tagclouds can only occupy a certain amount of the overall screen real estate. We must consider the placement of the tagcloud in the UI, the context of how they are displayed and if they are on their own page. Special tag groupings are often displayed seperately highlighing their importance to users. The temporal aspect of a tag cloud is one of the aspects that gives it usefulness. It represents the state of the resource collection "right now".
    Sources - wikipedia, art design and visual thinking,Composition and Design Elements, Principles, and Visual Effects ,Design Exploring the Elements & Principles
    Technorati Tags:
    Next Page »

    Powered by WordPress